In Brief

HSPD-12: Slow Out of the Gate

Federal agencies are struggling to hit mandated deadlines for one-card employee identification and access.

By Sarah D. Scalet

May 21, 2007CSO

Access Control

HSPD-12: Slow Out of the Gate

By Sarah D. Scalet

Product testing, contract process hold up worker smart cards

ACCESS CONTROL Its been called the biggest access control project ever. As of last October, most federal agencies were required to start issuing standard identification cards that could be used for both physical and logical access to government facilities. The idea behind the order, known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12), is to create a highly secure, standard ID card that is recognized and trusted across the government. The Federal Information Processing Standard 201, known as FIPS 201, sets out strict rules for how agencies must meet HSPD-12. (See our coverage at www

.csoonline.com/080106.)

Implementing the ambitious standard has not been easy, and most of the agencies that are technically in compliance have only barely begun. (See chart.) One reason for the slow rollout: At the October deadline, the General Services Administration was still working on its test tool for determining whether a given smart card was interoperable with other components, says Michael Butler, chairman of the Federal Smart Card Interagency Advisory Board and the Department of Defenses access card office director. Once the tool was completed, all players could test their implementations.

Butler adds that during January and February, both vendors and federal agencies were busy making tweaks to their Personal Identity Verification (PIV) cards. Now, were getting to the point where at least when you talk to [one vendor or agencys card], its going to give the same answers back in the same format as [another vendor or agencys card]. Thats really the basis for future interoperability, Butler says.

Another wrinkle: The GSA, which as a shared service provider is issuing PIV cards to other agencies for a fee, is renegotiating its contract with BearingPoint, the consulting and systems integration company it hired to issue the cards. Chris Niedermayer, a member of the Executive Steering Committee running the project governmentwide, says the contract was put out again not because of BearingPoints performance, but because another vendor protested the contract.

Niedermayer, who is associate CIO at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, says that his agency, at least, is not getting any additional new PIV cards from the GSA while the contract is being recompeted. He anticipates that card issuance will restart in July and said the delay could have a plus: He expects the new contract to cost less than the current $120 per person.

In the meantime, the USDA has successfully tested the cards using an electronic physical access system at a security turnstile. The department also has set up a test environment for using that same card with a single-sign-on system for users to access up to 236 software applications.

RESOURCE CENTER
Loading...
VIRTUAL CONFERENCE
Data Center Directions Virtual Conference

Data Center VCAttend this free, 100% online event exploring tools and techniques for making your data center deliver for today and tomorrow.

» Learn more and register here

WEBCAST
The Surest Path to Effective and Efficient Compliance

VeriSignIn this webcast, we explore why and how — with best practices, practical tips and solutions that work — to ease your compliance challenge.

» View the webcast

Featured Sponsors
Sponsored Links

Think your data is safe? Think again. It's time to Outthink the Threat. Get eBook now

Prepare for (ISC)2® Certification With Villanova - Online

ITCi White Paper: Challenges and Opportunities of PCI

Effective Security with a Continuous Approach to ISO 27001 Compliance

Rolling the dice with your security? Take the Self-Assessment Test now

Digital Identity Protection and Data Security Get Personal

Everything Today's CISO Needs to Know About Using SSO to Succeed in the Web 2.0 Era

Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) report: Save Millions in Fraud Losses.

Diebold: Frost & Sullivan Global Physical Security Systems Integrator of the Year

Revolutionizing Endpoint Security with a Single Agent

Envision Identity-Based Access Control for the Datacenter

IT Service Management: Metrics That Matter

E-LOAN Maintains Reputation as a Privacy Leader with Symantec

Data Loss Prevention: Keeping Sensitive Data Out of the Wrong Hands

Prudential Financial Protects its Brand with Symantec

Envision Identity-Based Access Control for the Datacenter

IDC Defines an Identity and Access Management Submarket for Managing Privileged User Accounts and Meeting GRC Requirements

The Case for Business Software Assurance ~ Securing Your Applications

Learn how the new Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ processor improves performance

Configuration Audit and Control for Virtualized Environments

The PCI Data Security Standard

Configuration Audit and Control for Virtualized Environments

IDC Defines an Identity and Access Management Submarket

Welcome to the age of Service-Oriented Security (SOS)

Solving Online Credit Fraud Using Device Reputation

Take our CSO role survey and receive a copy of the results

Ponemon Study: How Much Does a Data Breach "Cost"?

Data Protection: Challenges for the Traveling User

Key strategies for C-level executives and security staff

Configuration Assessment: Choosing the Right Solution

7 Requirements of Data Loss Prevention

Information Security: Data Drains and How to Prevent Loss

How Are Open Source Development Communities Embracing Security Best Practices?

Using Likewise to Comply with PCI Data Security Standard

Enabling Compliance with Converged Mainframe Security and Storage